You, and a very few writers and commentators have recognized that National Socialism, and the Socialism touted by Universities are the same. Just different nicknames.
It’s always been the same. The National Socialists cry Russia, Russia, Russia, just like in WW II, when China and Russia are allies. Sometimes in competition for territory but ideologically the same.
The EU has accomplished what Schicklgruber failed to achieve. China kept their regime essentially intact since Mao. Now Britain and the EU as well as China are trying to finish the job using different monikers.
These idiots who embrace these world order totalitarians aren’t all stupid, they just want to make sure they are in the top level when the final battle is won.
That includes media, deep state, and all the little sub organizations that use popular sounding names.
It’s one of the left’s oldest lies – clocking in at more than 100 years old when the 'Swashbuckling Little Politician' and his ‘Gray shirted army’ was just starting out in 1922.
But, this was noted back in 1944 by Friedrich Hayek, in his work The Road to Serfdom: Condensed Edition.
'No less significant is the intellectual outlook of the rank and file in the communist and fascist movements in Germany before 1933. The relative ease with which a young communist could be converted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known, best of all to the propagandists of the two parties. The communists and Nazis clashed more frequently with each other than with other parties simply because they competed for the same type of mind and reserved for each other the hatred of the heretic. Their practice showed how closely they are related. To both, the real enemy, the man with whom they had nothing in common, was the liberal of the old type. While to the Nazi the communist and to the communist the Nazi, and to both the socialist, are potential recruits made of the right timber, they both know that there can be no compromise between them and those who really believe in individual freedom."
My theory (which I first heard from Dave on X22) is that the real string-pullers have no intention of these two being the actual candidates when election time comes. They are put out there now because they are so terrible and so extreme. Who knows how this will play out, but they will be replaced by somebody more "popular".
You, and a very few writers and commentators have recognized that National Socialism, and the Socialism touted by Universities are the same. Just different nicknames.
It’s always been the same. The National Socialists cry Russia, Russia, Russia, just like in WW II, when China and Russia are allies. Sometimes in competition for territory but ideologically the same.
The EU has accomplished what Schicklgruber failed to achieve. China kept their regime essentially intact since Mao. Now Britain and the EU as well as China are trying to finish the job using different monikers.
These idiots who embrace these world order totalitarians aren’t all stupid, they just want to make sure they are in the top level when the final battle is won.
That includes media, deep state, and all the little sub organizations that use popular sounding names.
I miss the old days.
It’s one of the left’s oldest lies – clocking in at more than 100 years old when the 'Swashbuckling Little Politician' and his ‘Gray shirted army’ was just starting out in 1922.
But, this was noted back in 1944 by Friedrich Hayek, in his work The Road to Serfdom: Condensed Edition.
https://fee.org/ebooks/the-road-to-serfdom-condensed-edition/
'No less significant is the intellectual outlook of the rank and file in the communist and fascist movements in Germany before 1933. The relative ease with which a young communist could be converted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known, best of all to the propagandists of the two parties. The communists and Nazis clashed more frequently with each other than with other parties simply because they competed for the same type of mind and reserved for each other the hatred of the heretic. Their practice showed how closely they are related. To both, the real enemy, the man with whom they had nothing in common, was the liberal of the old type. While to the Nazi the communist and to the communist the Nazi, and to both the socialist, are potential recruits made of the right timber, they both know that there can be no compromise between them and those who really believe in individual freedom."
Thanks for the link. I’ll be reading this.
My theory (which I first heard from Dave on X22) is that the real string-pullers have no intention of these two being the actual candidates when election time comes. They are put out there now because they are so terrible and so extreme. Who knows how this will play out, but they will be replaced by somebody more "popular".