Watch as AZ Gov candidate Kari Lake destroys the left’s 2020 election narrative in less than 90 seconds.
A remarkable and convincing answer.
Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake eviscerated the anti-liberty left’s tiresome and worn-out election denial narrative at a campaign event recently by simply asking why we can’t raise questions on these matters.
Since the nation’s socialist media has become the propaganda arm of the fascist far left, they have incessantly flogged this narrative over and over.
The Federalist backed up her point:
Hillary Clinton, Biden’s Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, and a whole slew of congressional Democrats denied that former President Donald Trump was legitimately elected in 2016. Not only that, but they still tout and fundraise on the lie that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election.
Recent history is replete with examples of ‘Democrats of high and low repute complaining about ‘stolen elections’ when the Republican party wins. Then suddenly, all of that vanishes down the memory hole whenever they win. Why is that?
This is just another example of how George Orwell’s 1984 is terrifyingly coming to life, and trust us, the results are going to be double plus ungood.
Anti-liberty leftists have co-opted basic words such “denier” and distorted their meaning for their own purposes. It started with the phrase ‘climate change denier’ despite the fact that it’s doubtful anyone denies the climate changes. But the word police of the anti-liberty left were of course distorting the definition. Then they went a step further and shortened it to ‘climate denier’ which goes into a realm beyond Orwellian. Seriously, who denies that there is climate?
Never satisfied with screwing up the King’s English in just one area, the enemies of liberty and common sense decided to do the same with “election denier.” It’s time that we stand up for the common sense of asking questions; that’s one way of resisting tyranny.
Originally published on the American Thinker
They co-opted the word virus: virus (n.)
late 14c., "poisonous substance" (a sense now archaic [on/by whose authority is that sense "archaic"?]), from Latin virus "poison, sap of plants, slimy liquid, a potent juice," from Proto-Italic *weis-o-(s-) "poison," which is probably from a PIE root *ueis-, perhaps originally meaning "to melt away, to flow," used of foul or malodorous fluids, but with specialization in some languages to "poisonous fluid" (source also of Sanskrit visam "venom, poison," visah "poisonous;" Avestan vish- "poison;" Latin viscum "sticky substance, birdlime;" Greek ios "poison," ixos "mistletoe, birdlime;" Old Church Slavonic višnja "cherry;" Old Irish fi "poison;" Welsh gwy "poison").
The meaning "agent that causes infectious disease" emerged by 1790s gradually out of the earlier use in reference to venereal disease (by 1728); the modern scientific use dates to the 1880s. The computer sense is from 1972 [These 2 meanings are invalid because they totally contradict the original meaning].
VIRUS (among Physicians) a kind of watery stinking Matter, which issues out of Ulcers, being endued with eating and malignant Qualities. [Bailey's dictionary, 1770] The study of these viruses is called toxinology. Why isn't it called VIROLOGY? http://dictionary.sensagent.com/Toxinology/en-en/